Tie into the old roof or stand it on its own posts?
On a craftsman or Victorian bungalow the attached cover is the one that looks right, because the new roof reads as a continuation of the original. It is also the one that depends entirely on framing that was cut and nailed a century ago. Rafters on many early-1900s Heights houses are smaller than modern lumber and often carry more than one layer of roofing already, so a ledger bolted to the rear wall may be hanging weight on a wall plate that was never sized for it. We open a section of soffit or attic to see what is actually there before we commit to the attached design.
A freestanding cover on its own four or six posts sidesteps that question. It carries its own weight to its own footings, it can be set a few inches off the house with a flashed gap, and it lets the original eave stay untouched, which matters on blocks where the rear elevation is visible from a side street. The trade is a slightly heavier post-and-beam look and a small step in the ceiling line. On newer Heights construction with modern framing, the attached version is usually the simpler build, and we go that direction unless the roofline argues otherwise.










